I know I shouldn’t enjoy it so much, but I am always ridiculously impressed with how deftly Mrs. John Dashwood manipulates her husband.
Classic Books
Currently Reading: Sense and Sensibility by Jane Austen
Completed: Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen
Currently Reading: Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen
Currently Reading: Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen
Lee is on page 135 of 493
I think one of my favorite things in the novel that gets missed out in the screen adaptations is how Mr. Bennet thought to himself, “Wow, this Collins kid seems like a canoe full of douches, better invite him to stay with my family ASAP!” and then spends the whole time either wishing Collins would shut up or entertaining himself with Collins’ douchebaggery and everyone else’s suffering of it.
Classic Remarks: March 3, 2017
Classic Remarks is a meme hosted on Pages Unbound that poses questions each Friday about classic literature and asks participants to engage in ongoing discussions surrounding not only themes in the novels but also questions about canon formation, the “timelessness” of literature, and modes of interpretation.
This Weeks Prompt:
What do you think of adapting classics for younger readers?
I mean, technically I agree with it and like it… I like the idea of young readers getting exposed to the classics, and I’m all for making books accessible to people of all ages.
The problem I have with it is I feel like the book loses something when it’s adapted.
And don’t get me started on adaptations for teens… They tend to border on ridiculous. It feels like they are written by people who have never met a teenager and can’t even remember being one. Like when you read it you can hear them being like “Yes…this is what the young people like… I’m a genius!”
Perhaps if it could be arranged that established YA authors could be offered the job of adapting a classic for the YA audience. That would make it less terrible I think, and they’d know how to keep the important themes and literary devices intact.
As for the kids ones… Even when I was a kid, I thought there was something missing from them. I remember asking my mom if pages were missing from the book because the story just didn’t fit together properly.
My hope is that I was just exposed to really bad adaptations. Because the practice of adapting classics for younger groups has so much potential. I can think of a lot of stories I would have enjoyed as a kid, but the writing was such that it just didn’t hold my attention until around 5th grade…
ADDENDUM (because while reading/commenting on this post I realized there was some stuff I neglected to mention):
Also let’s not forget, if a parent is a reader and wants to expose their children to the classics, there’s nothing that says they can’t read it TO them, and explain the parts the kids need explained. Like maybe no Shakespeare, but things like Jane Austen or some Brontë works. There’s literally no reason the parent couldn’t read the un-adapted version to a child and explain it as they go so the kid can enjoy the story even if they are too young to comprehend everything when reading it alone.
And there are some classics that could be considered for kids to begin with, but their status as “classics” makes people think they are too high brow or something.
What do you think of classic adaptations targeted at young audiences?
Make your own post and send me a link, or just leave your opinion in the comments.